Quartz reports: "China just set the date for its twice-a-decade leadership reshuffle: the ruling Communist Party will hold its 19th national congress on Oct. 18. As the big day nears, lots of the behind-the-scene political struggles are gearing up... Speculation is mounting that Chinese president Xi Jinping could break away from convention to hold onto power for 10 more years, rather than five. Another key reshuffle is already underway in the run-up to the congress. In recent days, Xi has promoted favorites to top posts in the People's Liberation Army (PLA). Xi chairs the Central Military Commission, a 11-member top decision-making body of the Chinese military, the world's biggest. Since 2015, Xi has launched a string of military reforms including cutting troop numbers and regrouping existing military districts. He also waged war against allegedly corrupt military officials—prominent among them are two disgraced top generals, Xu Caihou and Guo Boxiong... 'To build a strong military, we must unswervingly adhere to the Party's absolute leadership over the armed forces,' Xi said in a speech marking the PLA's 90th anniversary last month. Undoubtedly, the leadership is with Xi at its core, as reflected by the recent personnel changes."
Foreign Policy comments: "After 10 weeks, the latest chapter in the long-running China-India-Bhutan border dispute has come to an end. On Monday, India and China agreed to remove their troops from a disputed region called the Doklam Plateau, claimed by both China and Bhutan... Although the dust-up failed to attract much attention from the international community, it is nonetheless worthy of note, both for what it says about a rising China's more forward-leaning approach to its neighbors, and also for what it says about the Trump administration's strangely inattentive approach to an increasingly restive Asia... One wonders whether this particular standoff highlights rising China's disinterest in actually resolving its border disputes with India and Bhutan. After all, it was Chinese border activity that provoked the standoff. Once the scuffle began, Beijing maintained an aggressive and aggrieved tone. Its public rhetoric was all stick and no carrot. Beijing also insisted, both publicly and privately, that an Indian withdrawal of troops should precede any negotiated solution, a demand that was hard to square with the fact that, in this case, it had moved first to change the status quo. None of these moves indicate that China is anxious to conclude a final deal anytime soon."
CNN reports: "When Russia sent its bombers flying over the Korean peninsula last week, it was as much a signal to its allies in Beijing as it was a telegraph to Washington that Moscow too, was pivoting to Asia. The Kremlin may not become Pyongyang's most steadfast and critical defender in this newest conflagration, but its cameo in the region is another attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to insert himself into a geo-political stalemate involving the US. Experts say it may also help deflect attention from upcoming military exercises in Belarus and western Russia next month, which have upset NATO members concerned about what amounts to a mass buildup of Russian troops on the edges of eastern Europe. China, which sent bombers into the air itself shortly after, declined to comment about the show of force from Moscow. In its regular press briefing on Wednesday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said it would not 'quantify how close China and Russia are cooperating on the North Korean nuclear issue,' said Hua Chunying, a ministry spokeswoman."