The New York Times comments: "President Trump has managed to turn America First into America Isolated. In pulling out of the Paris climate accord, Mr. Trump has created a vacuum of global leadership that presents ripe opportunities to allies and adversaries alike to reorder the world's power structure. His decision is perhaps the greatest strategic gift to the Chinese, who are eager to fill the void that Washington is leaving around the world on everything from setting the rules of trade and environmental standards to financing the infrastructure projects that give Beijing vast influence...'The irony here is that people worried that Trump would come in and make the world safe for Russian meddling,' said Richard N. Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, who was briefly considered, then rejected, for a top post in the new administration. 'He may yet do that,' Mr. Haass added, 'but he has certainly made the world safe for Chinese influence.'... for months the Chinese president has been stepping unto the breach, including giving speeches at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, that made it sound like China alone was ready to adopt the role of global standard-setter that Washington has occupied since the end of World War II."
Reuters reports: "The European Union and China warned U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday he was making a major error by withdrawing from the Paris climate pact, but the pair failed to agree a formal climate statement because of divisions over trade. Speaking alongside Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, the EU's Donald Tusk said efforts to reduce pollution and combat rising sea levels would now continue without the United States. But a spat on trade and steel production underscored the differences in a sometimes difficult EU-China relationship...Despite what officials described as a warm meeting, China and the European Union could not agree on a broader final communique meant to focus on a range of other issues discussed at the talks, including a commitment to free trade and measures needed to reduce a global steel glut. The leaders' news conference was delayed for three hours as they sought to find agreement. According to one person present at the summit, China's insistence on a reference that the European Union will eventually recognize China as an economy driven by the market, not the state, blocked the final 60-point statement. That also meant there could be no agreement on a formal pledge to work together to reduce global steel production."
The Wall Street Journal reports: "The decision by the People's Bank of China to sharply increase the value of the yuan against the dollar at its daily fixing Thursday surprised many investors, particularly those in the West who have long valued state-directed currency movements less for their immediate direction than for signs of the underlying policy that the central bank appears to be pursuing. In this case, many investors said they believed China was seeking to build confidence in its economy at a time of deepening concern about the possible ripple effects from a long-running debt buildup and a state crackdown on loose lending in certain sectors. Those concerns were intensified in April, when capital outflows were estimated to have picked up after moderating in the first quarter. And last week, Moody's Investors Service downgraded China's sovereign-debt rating, the first such cut since 1989. At the same time, many investors said they continued to expect that China would succeed in its efforts to manage its way out of the debt buildup without significantly reducing its growth or increasing volatility in financial markets."